BREAKING NEWS: Scotland moves a step closer to legalising assisted dying.

  • Staff Writer

BREAKING NEWS: Scotland moves a step closer to legalising assisted dying.

Scotland could become the first UK nation to provide terminally ill people with assistance to end their lives if a bill that has been introduced at Holyrood is approved.

DemRef today have launched a public referendum on assisted dying in Scotland that we believe is of particular importance due to the profound ethical, moral, and societal implications of such legislation. Here are key reasons why a referendum on this issue is considered significant:

What do you think – vote now here !


The proposal of an assisted dying bill by the Scottish Government represents a watershed moment in the country’s legal and ethical landscape. Assisted dying, a topic of profound moral complexity and deep personal significance, has emerged at the forefront of legislative discussion in Scotland, mirroring a broader global conversation on end-of-life choices. This proposed legislation, aimed at granting adults suffering from terminal illnesses the autonomy to end their lives with dignity and under stringent conditions, has sparked a wide-ranging debate, touching on aspects of compassion, autonomy, ethical principles, and the role of government in regulating end-of-life decisions.

The significance of this debate extends beyond the parameters of law and policy, delving into the very essence of human rights, dignity, and the societal values that underpin Scottish governance. With this proposal, Scotland joins a growing list of jurisdictions worldwide grappling with the ethical, legal, and practical implications of legalizing assisted dying. This introduction sets the stage for a comprehensive exploration of the bill’s provisions, the ethical debates it engenders, the public opinion surrounding it, and its potential implications for Scottish society and beyond.

Now, let’s proceed to the Historical Context section. This part will detail previous attempts at similar legislation, shifts in public and political opinion over time, and how global trends in assisted dying legislation have influenced the current proposal.

Historical Context

The journey towards the introduction of an assisted dying bill in Scotland is marked by years of debate, evolving public opinion, and legislative attempts that have shaped the current discourse on this deeply divisive issue. This historical context is crucial to understanding the significance of the Scottish Government’s proposal, highlighting a trajectory influenced by both domestic and international shifts in perspective on end-of-life care and the rights of individuals suffering from terminal illnesses.

Previous Legislative Attempts

Scotland’s legislative history has seen several previous attempts to introduce assisted dying laws. Notably, the late Margo MacDonald, a former Scottish Parliament MSP who herself was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease, was a prominent advocate for assisted dying. MacDonald introduced the End-of-Life Assistance (Scotland) Bill in 2010, which sought to allow terminally ill adults the right to choose an assisted death. Despite generating considerable public and media attention, the bill was defeated, with many lawmakers expressing ethical and practical concerns.

In the years that followed, the debate did not subside. Instead, it gained complexity as societal attitudes continued to evolve. Further attempts at legislation were made, reflecting a persistent dialogue within Scottish society about the balance between individual autonomy and the moral and ethical implications of assisted dying.

Global Influences and Shifts in Public Opinion

The global landscape for assisted dying legislation has seen significant changes over the past decades. Countries like the Netherlands, Belgium, Canada, and some states in the United States have enacted laws that permit some form of assisted dying under specific conditions. These international examples have contributed to the evolving debate in Scotland, offering models for legal frameworks, safeguards, and ethical considerations.

Parallel to international legislative developments, public opinion in Scotland has shown a notable shift towards supporting assisted dying. Polls and surveys have consistently indicated that a significant majority of the Scottish public supports the introduction of legislation that would allow terminally ill individuals to choose to end their lives with medical assistance, under strict legal and medical guidelines. This shift in public sentiment has been instrumental in propelling the issue back onto the parliamentary agenda, reflecting broader societal changes in attitudes towards death, dignity, and personal autonomy.

The historical context of assisted dying legislation in Scotland is marked by evolving legal attempts, shifting public opinions, and the influence of international precedents. These elements combined have set the stage for the current proposal, indicating a society that is increasingly engaging with complex ethical questions about the end of life. As Scotland stands on the cusp of a potential legislative milestone, this history underscores the depth and complexity of the journey toward recognizing and legislating the right to a dignified death.

Ethical Considerations

The debate surrounding the proposed Assisted Dying Bill in Scotland is deeply entrenched in ethical considerations. These considerations span a wide spectrum of views, reflecting the complex interplay between individual autonomy, the sanctity of life, the role of medical professionals, and societal values. This section examines the primary ethical arguments for and against assisted dying and considers the perspectives of various stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, religious groups, and advocacy organizations.

Arguments for Assisted Dying

Autonomy and Dignity: A cornerstone of the argument in favour of assisted dying is the principle of autonomy. Proponents argue that individuals with terminal illnesses should have the right to decide when and how they die, asserting that this choice is fundamental to personal dignity. The ability to control one’s end-of-life scenario is seen as a critical aspect of maintaining dignity in the face of debilitating, terminal conditions.

Alleviation of Suffering: Advocates also highlight the compassionate aspect of assisted dying, emphasizing its role in alleviating unbearable physical and psychological suffering. They argue that, for some individuals, palliative care may not sufficiently relieve pain and distress, making assisted dying a humane alternative.

Consistency with Medical Ethics: Some argue that assisted dying is consistent with the ethical principle of beneficence in medicine, which mandates acting in the best interest of the patient. They suggest that when prolonging life causes more harm than benefit, assisting in a dignified death can be ethically justified.

Arguments Against Assisted Dying

Sanctity of Life: Opponents often invoke the sanctity of life principle, arguing that life should be preserved and that assisted dying undermines this fundamental value. They contend that legalizing assisted dying could erode societal respect for the inherent value of life.

Potential for Coercion and Abuse: There are concerns about the potential for coercion and the risk of vulnerable individuals being pressured into choosing death, either directly or indirectly, due to societal or familial pressures. Critics argue that safeguards might not be foolproof, leading to abuses of the system.

Slippery Slope: The slippery slope argument suggests that legalizing assisted dying for those with terminal illnesses could lead to broader criteria over time, potentially encompassing those who are not terminally ill, including individuals with mental health issues or disabilities, thereby widening the scope of who is considered eligible for assisted dying.

Role of Healthcare Professionals: The involvement of medical professionals in assisted dying raises ethical concerns regarding their role in preserving life. Some healthcare providers express discomfort with participating in assisted dying, viewing it as contradictory to their commitment to healing and saving lives.

Balancing Diverse Perspectives

The ethical debate on assisted dying is further complicated by the diverse perspectives of religious groups, advocacy organizations for the elderly and disabled, and the medical community. Religious groups often oppose assisted dying based on doctrinal beliefs about the sanctity of life and divine sovereignty over life and death. Conversely, some advocacy organizations argue that assisted dying can provide a dignified choice for those facing the end of life, advocating for robust safeguards to protect vulnerable populations.

The ethical considerations surrounding assisted dying are multifaceted and deeply personal. They encapsulate fundamental questions about life, death, suffering, and autonomy. As the Scottish Parliament considers the proposed Assisted Dying Bill, these ethical debates will play a pivotal role in shaping the legislation, reflecting a collective grappling with profound moral dilemmas. The challenge lies in finding a balance that respects individual autonomy and dignity while safeguarding against potential abuses and maintaining the ethical integrity of the medical profession.

Comparative Analysis – what are other countries around the world doing?

The global landscape of assisted dying legislation presents a diverse array of approaches, each tailored to the specific ethical, cultural, and legal contexts of individual jurisdictions. By examining the experiences of countries that have legalized assisted dying, such as the Netherlands, Belgium, Canada, and certain states in the USA, Scotland can glean valuable insights into the potential implications of its proposed Assisted Dying Bill. This comparative analysis highlights key lessons and considerations that may inform Scotland’s legislative process and implementation strategies.

The Netherlands

The Netherlands was the first country to legalize euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in 2002, with strict criteria and rigorous safeguards. Key lessons from the Dutch experience include the importance of a transparent and meticulous review process for each case, ensuring that all legal requirements are met and documented. The Netherlands employs a review committee system that assesses every case of assisted dying, offering an accountability mechanism that could serve as a model for Scotland.


Belgium followed suit in legalizing euthanasia in 2002, with provisions that allow it under certain conditions, including unbearable suffering and consent from the patient. Belgium’s approach highlights the significance of psychological suffering as a criterion alongside physical suffering, broadening the eligibility for assisted dying. This inclusivity raises important ethical considerations for Scotland regarding the scope of assisted dying legislation and the need for comprehensive psychological support and assessments.


Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) legislation, enacted in 2016, provides a framework that balances individual autonomy with protective measures against coercion and vulnerability. Canada’s incremental expansion of eligibility, including proposed amendments to include mental illness as a sole underlying condition, underscores the evolving nature of assisted dying legislation. For Scotland, Canada’s experience emphasizes the potential for legislative adaptation and the importance of ongoing public and parliamentary debate to address emerging ethical and practical challenges.

United States

In the United States, assisted dying laws vary by state, with Oregon being the first to legalize physician-assisted suicide in 1997 through the Death with Dignity Act. The state-based approach in the U.S. demonstrates the potential for localized control and adaptation of assisted dying policies. Oregon’s model, which includes stringent eligibility criteria, a mandatory waiting period, and a requirement for patients to administer the medication themselves, offers insights into safeguarding patient autonomy and preventing abuse. This decentralized approach could inform Scotland’s consideration of regional perspectives and healthcare delivery systems in implementing assisted dying legislation.

Lessons for Scotland

From these international examples, several key lessons emerge for Scotland:

  • Comprehensive Safeguards: The importance of robust safeguards to protect vulnerable populations and ensure informed consent.
  • Ongoing Review and Adaptation: The necessity of a flexible legislative framework that can adapt to changing societal values and emerging ethical considerations.
  • Public and Professional Engagement: The need for active engagement with healthcare professionals, patients, and the public to foster trust and ensure the ethical implementation of assisted dying legislation.
  • Transparency and Accountability: The value of transparent reporting and review mechanisms to maintain public trust and ensure compliance with legal standards.

As Scotland contemplates the introduction of an assisted dying bill, examining the experiences of jurisdictions where such practices are legal offers invaluable insights. These international examples highlight the complexity of creating a legislative framework that respects individual autonomy while ensuring ethical integrity and societal protection. By learning from the successes and challenges faced by others, Scotland can navigate the intricate ethical, legal, and practical landscapes of assisted dying with informed caution and compassion.

Next, we will delve into the potential impacts of the proposed Assisted Dying Bill on healthcare systems, families, society, and legal frameworks in Scotland.

Potential Impacts of healthcare, legal, family & society

The introduction of an Assisted Dying Bill in Scotland carries with it potential impacts that span the breadth of healthcare systems, legal frameworks, societal norms, and the dynamics within families. Understanding these impacts is crucial for lawmakers, healthcare providers, and the public to make informed decisions regarding this significant legislative proposal. This section explores the possible ramifications of legalizing assisted dying in Scotland, focusing on the healthcare system, legal considerations, family relationships, and broader societal implications.

Impact on Healthcare Systems

Resource Allocation: The implementation of assisted dying legislation may require significant healthcare resources, including training for medical professionals, the establishment of review boards, and the creation of support systems for patients and families. These requirements could lead to a reallocation of resources within already stretched healthcare systems.

Healthcare Provider Roles: Medical professionals would need to navigate new roles, potentially including the assessment of eligibility for assisted dying, participation in the administration of life-ending procedures, and providing end-of-life counselling. This shift could impact healthcare providers’ ethical stances and professional identities, necessitating comprehensive support and guidance.

Legal and Regulatory Implications

Safeguarding Against Abuse: Crafting and enforcing safeguards to prevent coercion and abuse will be a primary concern. This includes establishing clear guidelines for documentation, informed consent, and the assessment of patient eligibility, requiring a robust legal and regulatory framework.

Legal Precedence: The assisted dying bill would set significant legal precedents regarding end-of-life care, potentially influencing future legislation on related issues such as palliative care, healthcare rights, and ethical medical practices.

Impact on Families and Society

Family Dynamics: Assisted dying could alter family dynamics, with potential effects on how families experience and process grief. It may also raise difficult conversations about death, dignity, and choice, requiring sensitive support systems to help families navigate these discussions.

Societal Attitudes Toward Death: Legalizing assisted dying may influence societal attitudes towards death and dying, potentially reducing stigma around discussing end-of-life options and encouraging more open conversations about death as a part of life. However, it could also spark polarizing debates about the value of life and the ethics of choosing death.

The potential impacts of an Assisted Dying Bill in Scotland are profound and multifaceted, affecting not only the healthcare system and legal landscape but also the fabric of families and society at large. As Scotland considers this legislation, it is essential to carefully weigh these impacts, drawing on both domestic experiences and international examples. The challenge lies in creating a framework that respects individual autonomy and dignity while safeguarding against potential abuses and ensuring that the healthcare system can support this significant shift in end-of-life care practices.

This exploration into the potential impacts sets the stage for discussing public opinion and advocacy, examining how various groups within Scotland view the proposed Assisted Dying Bill and their influence on the legislative process.

Public Opinion and Advocacy

The discourse surrounding the proposed Assisted Dying Bill in Scotland is heavily influenced by public opinion and the activities of advocacy groups. These entities play a pivotal role in shaping the legislative landscape, reflecting the diverse perspectives within Scottish society. This section delves into the current state of public opinion regarding assisted dying in Scotland and examines the positions of various advocacy groups and political parties on this contentious issue.

Public Opinion in Scotland

Recent polls and surveys in Scotland have indicated a significant shift towards supporting assisted dying, with most respondents expressing favour for legislation that would allow terminally ill individuals to choose to end their lives with medical assistance. This growing public support reflects a broader trend towards prioritizing personal autonomy and dignity at the end of life, mirroring changes in societal attitudes observed in other countries. However, the issue remains divisive, with passionate voices on both sides of the debate advocating for their respective positions.

Positions of Advocacy Groups and Political Parties

Advocacy Groups: Advocacy organizations play a crucial role in the debate over assisted dying. Groups such as Dignity in Dying Scotland advocate for the right of terminally ill individuals to have control over their death, emphasizing compassion and choice. Conversely, organizations like Care Not Killing oppose the bill, citing concerns over the potential for coercion and the devaluation of vulnerable lives. These advocacy groups engage in public campaigns, provide testimony to parliament, and mobilize support to influence the legislative process.

Political Parties: The stance on assisted dying varies among Scotland’s political parties, with some expressing cautious support contingent on stringent safeguards, while others oppose it on ethical or practical grounds. The debate transcends traditional party lines, often reflecting personal convictions rather than party policy, suggesting that any parliamentary vote on the matter could see members voting based on conscience rather than party allegiance.

Public opinion and advocacy are central to the ongoing debate over the Assisted Dying Bill in Scotland, reflecting the complex ethical, legal, and social dimensions of the issue. As the Scottish Parliament considers the bill, the voices of the public and advocacy groups will continue to play a critical role in shaping the future of assisted dying legislation, underscoring the importance of a nuanced and inclusive discussion.

With an understanding of the roles of public opinion and advocacy in the debate over assisted dying, we now move towards concluding our exploration of the proposed Assisted Dying Bill in Scotland, summarizing key points and considering the future outlook.

The proposal of an Assisted Dying Bill in Scotland marks a pivotal moment in the country’s legislative and ethical landscape. Through examining the historical context, key provisions of the bill, ethical considerations, comparative international examples, potential impacts, and the influence of public opinion and advocacy, it’s clear this issue touches deeply on fundamental questions of autonomy, dignity, and compassion. As Scotland stands at the crossroads of potentially adopting this significant piece of legislation, the debate encapsulates a broader societal reflection on how we approach the most profound aspects of human life and death. The path Scotland chooses will undoubtedly have lasting implications, highlighting the importance of engaging in this complex discussion with sensitivity, respect, and a commitment to upholding the values that define a compassionate society.

This comprehensive exploration of the proposed Assisted Dying Bill in Scotland has sought to provide a detailed understanding of the many facets involved in this deeply significant issue. As the Scottish Parliament moves forward with its consideration, the discussions and decisions made will reflect not only on legal and healthcare systems but also on societal values and ethical principles at the heart of Scottish community life.

DemRef today have launched a public referendum on assisted dying in Scotland that we believe is of particular importance due to the profound ethical, moral, and societal implications of such legislation. Here are key reasons why a referendum on this issue is considered significant:

  1. Reflects Societal Values and Beliefs
  • Assisted dying touches on deeply held beliefs about life, death, autonomy, and dignity. A public referendum allows for these diverse viewpoints to be directly reflected in the decision-making process, ensuring that the legislation aligns with the collective moral compass of Scottish society.
  1. Legitimacy and Consensus
  • Given the contentious nature of assisted dying, a referendum provides a mechanism to achieve a broad consensus. The outcome of a public vote lends legitimacy to the legislation, ensuring that it is grounded in the expressed will of the people, rather than solely in the hands of elected representatives.
  1. Engagement and Awareness
  • Holding a referendum necessitates a comprehensive public discussion and campaign period, during which the nuances of the issue, including ethical considerations, potential safeguards, and the experiences of other jurisdictions, can be explored in depth. This process educates the public, fosters engagement, and promotes informed decision-making.
  1. Direct Democracy in Action
  • Assisted dying, by its nature, is a personal issue that affects individuals and families in very direct ways. A referendum embodies the principle of direct democracy, allowing individuals to have a direct say in matters that significantly impact personal choices and freedoms at the end of life.
  1. Precedent for Future Policy
  • The decision on whether to legalize assisted dying has implications beyond the immediate issue, setting a precedent for how other sensitive and ethically charged issues might be approached in the future. A referendum demonstrates a commitment to involving the public in these foundational decisions.
  1. Resolution of Political Impasse
  • In situations where there is significant division among politicians or within political parties, a public referendum can provide a clear direction from the electorate, helping to resolve political stalemates and move the issue forward based on democratic principles.
  1. Accountability and Responsibility
  • A referendum places the responsibility for the decision directly in the hands of the people, ensuring that the outcome reflects public opinion and values. This can alleviate the pressure on individual lawmakers who may face ethical dilemmas or conflicts between personal beliefs and constituent expectations.


A public referendum on assisted dying in Scotland represents a critical exercise in democracy, enabling a direct and engaged approach to one of the most profound ethical issues facing society today. By involving the public directly in the decision-making process, Scotland can ensure that any move towards legalizing assisted dying is done with the fullest possible understanding and support of its citizens, reflecting a collective determination of the society’s values and direction.

Vote now click here have your say!

*Disclaimer DemRef is completely independent & unbiased we do not condone nor condemn the content of any poll we publish. DemRef is simply a platform that stands for open debate, transparency & democratic participation & engagement.